During 2011 off Somalia (or by Somalia based
piracy) about 20 percent (48 out of 237) of the reported attacks led to
boarding or hijacking. This was a lower number compared to previous year’s
thanks you several different factors, such as:
-
In
2011 most crews and ship operators had understood the seriousness of piracy and
enforced effective measures.
-
The
naval forces in the area were more effective.
(but also that all attacks (but one) was on a
steaming ship)
So far this year about 65 percent of the attacks
off West Africa has led to boarding or hijacking and in South East Asia almost all
(>90 percent) of the about 100 reported attacks has led to boarding and/or
hijacking.
One reason for this shift is that the reporting
frequency of incidents off Somalia was high, in other areas the reports of
unsuccessful attacks is not as good. But even despite this statistical error there
is a substantial increase in the percentage of attacks leading to the worst
possible consequences.
Worldwide
pirates had a success rate of 50 percent in 2011, 2013 it was above 80 percent!
One could even argue that piracy in areas such as off
West Africa and in South East Asia pose a bigger problem than what piracy did
off Somalia in 2011. This because a high success rate for pirates lures more
into the piracy business and also affects the crew’s negatively. Also, the fact
that Somalia based piracy attacked steaming ships made the problem easier to
handle, it is much harder to effectively protect berthed or anchored ships.
Therefore, the work off Somalia, often perceived
as a success, was a special case that unfortunately can give the wrong
impressions on what level of effort is needed to reduce piracy.
So, the work has just began and don’t let the
success off Somalia fool us in think that this problem is manageable…
No comments:
Post a Comment